Trek v. Lemond

Lance-Trek decided to dump Greg Lemond. Lemond was suing them it looks like. Because they were dissing Lemond Bikes, I think. That’s what is alleged in the complaint, read items 9-13 here, Lance-Trek provides the link. Lance Trek Bikes

Greg Lemond just isn’t enough of a whore. Because if he was, when confronted with the reality (IMHO) that Lance was a EPO using, steroid injecting, HGH sucking, cortisone salving mangy dog he just would of went for the cash and praised Lance like the rest of the marketing pinheads.

Now, Armstrong does a great job with the LA Cancer Foundation and all that. I’d give them money any day, every day. But that fucking duality is just part of being human. Because no matter how you slice it, putting out well over 400 watts sustained at 155# is just fucking Hot Rod blood, as Alexi would say.

So fucking Greg, impulsive guy that he is, commented on reality here and there. All of a sudden, he can’t be a good enough Lance Trek whore, because talking about the reality of PEDs, just doesn’t put you into that Emperor’s Club class of whore that Lance-Trek requires in whoredom.

You know what? Fuck it. I can’t keep my mouth shut either. I’ll be buying Lemond’s (have two so far) Bikes. Lance-Trek Bikes? Fuck them. I’ll buy none. I’m not going to support a company that not only didn’t get on the anti PED wagon, but actively, IMHO, tries to cover up stark, naked, fucking reality. I am with the truth, and I am voting Obama too.

About Bush43

“Long time cyclist, skier and purveyor of all that is good in this life.” SLC, Utah, USA

53 Replies to “Trek v. Lemond”

  1. “memo to mikeyhunt
    if you are able to tell us you are drunk all the damn time you probably are not”

    Butthead-

    Naw, man, I work for a living, I’m drunk less than half the time.

    Kirkwood was flippin’ sweet, dude, I loves me some corn snow. Awoo.

    Mikey

  2. …el jefe…word, as you kids say…

    …only ever said hi to the pleasant mr vails but i know mr overend enough to say that he is a gracious & straight up individual…

    …again, lemond AND armstrong are celebrated litigious “cycling personalities”…

    …both are now “litigious personalities” & as far as “celebrated cyclists”…hmmmm, not so much…