Why Bush Will Be A Winner?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestmailby feather

Point: William Kristol trots out the following in the Washington Post.

I suppose I’ll merely expose myself to harmless ridicule if I make the following assertion: George W. Bush’s presidency will probably be a successful one.

Harmless ridicule? How about “endless” ridicule? How ’bout I just say thanks for doing what can to fuck me, my family, my country, and the rest of the world each and every chance you get.

You pathetic little twit.

What it comes down to is this: If Petraeus succeeds in Iraq, and a Republican wins in 2008, Bush will be viewed as a successful president.

If Patraeus can really pull something out in the next six to eight months, Bush will still be remembered as one of the most evil, hateful manipulative bastards to ever darken the Whitehouse. His name shall forever live in infamy. My children, and children’s children, will read about his folly in their high school textbooks and laugh at him.

It won’t matter who wins in ’08. Bush will be hammered mercilessly in that election by both Democrats and Republicans alike. Everyone wants to be the candidate that will make thing right again, the answer to the last eight years. Even the Republicans will try to distance themselves from everything he’s done.

No way Bush comes through that looking like anything more than plain old horrible. His legacy, as it were, is shit.

Counter Point: Arianna Huffington offers up this at huffingtonpost.com

I know it’s a pretty high bar, but Bill Kristol, the founder of the Project for a New American Century that spawned the Iraq war, the man whose editorials often seem to be inserted directly into the president’s speeches, and who once boasted that “Dick Cheney does send over someone to pick up 30 copies of [The Weekly Standard] every Monday,” has now just written the single most deceptive piece of the entire war.

The charitable view is that he’s lost his mind. The less charitable view is that he’s now officially surpassed Dick Cheney as the most intellectually dishonest member of the neocon establishment (the highest of all high bars).

Knocked Dickbag Cheney off the top spot, did we? Well, bully for you billy-boy.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestmailby feather

About big jonny

The man, the legend. The guy who started it all back in the Year of Our Lord Beer, 2000, with a couple of pages worth of idiotic ranting hardcoded on some random porn site that would host anything you uploaded, a book called HTML for Dummies (which was completely appropriate), a bad attitude (which hasn’t much changed), and a Dell desktop running Win95 with 64 mgs of ram and a six gig hard drive. Those were the days. Then he went to law school. Go figure. Flagstaff, Arizona, USA

3 Replies to “Why Bush Will Be A Winner?”

  1. Big J,

    It’s the comments link at the end of Meth Kristol’s drug diary that is the classic of classics. I think I had to go to page #9 of the comments to find ONE that was loosely defensive of Meth Kristol.

    They are hilarious satire of Meth Kristol’s very existence.

    I mean the column is great, if you think Alice in Wonderland is a true story and so many boys weren’t dead in Meth’s name.

    You know the Weekly Standard is Meth Kristol’s Neocon paper. Take a gander at Meth’s associate editor telling us why he is too good to actually fight