<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landis Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/</link>
	<description>Two Wheels. One Dark Lord.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: el jefe</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3228</link>
		<dc:creator>el jefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3228</guid>
		<description>lets require them to get drunk on Jack (or something really hangover making like Knob Creek) every night...  You want to start tomorrow?  5 shots before bed you sally...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets require them to get drunk on Jack (or something really hangover making like Knob Creek) every night&#8230;  You want to start tomorrow?  5 shots before bed you sally&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikesgonewild</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>bikesgonewild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>...all extensive scientific testing aside, john, didn&#039;t that &#039;jack&#039; make you &quot;feel&quot; like you were a bad bike mofo ???...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;all extensive scientific testing aside, john, didn&#8217;t that &#8216;jack&#8217; make you &#8220;feel&#8221; like you were a bad bike mofo ???&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3202</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3202</guid>
		<description>I figured his story might be bullshit when extensive testing showed no benefit to my cycling from increased consumption of Jack Daniels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured his story might be bullshit when extensive testing showed no benefit to my cycling from increased consumption of Jack Daniels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikesgonewild</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3201</link>
		<dc:creator>bikesgonewild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3201</guid>
		<description>...straight up, el jefe...&quot;drunken pierre&#039;s house of science testing and stuff&quot; shouldn&#039;t even be able to test papp smears...
...oops, i said i wasn&#039;t gonna mention that biological refuse any more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;straight up, el jefe&#8230;&#8221;drunken pierre&#8217;s house of science testing and stuff&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t even be able to test papp smears&#8230;<br />
&#8230;oops, i said i wasn&#8217;t gonna mention that biological refuse any more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RocBike.com &#187; Links Of The Day: 20 September 2007</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>RocBike.com &#187; Links Of The Day: 20 September 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>[...] Landis Ruling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Landis Ruling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el jefe</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>el jefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>Maybe Floyd did, maybe he didn&#039;t.  We won&#039;t ever really know because LNDD ought to be called &quot;Drunken Pierre&#039;s House of Science Testing and Stuff&quot;  They have repeatedly had problems with protocol and leaks.  Yet they keep their accreditation.  They should get one chance, just like the riders.  If they have leaks or don&#039;t follow protocol, then they should have their licenses pulled.  All of their evidence would have been thrown out in any criminal proceedings.  Additionally, USADA just showed how biased they are by how they handled the hearings, and ruled in favor of a shaky case for doping for something like the 30th time.  (Remember, NO ONE has ever won an appeal to them)  I&#039;m all for kicking cheaters out of the sport, but the labs need to be held to the same standard.  If you are going to ruin someone&#039;s career, then you had better have bulletproof evidence.  If the UCI, WADA, LNDD, ASO, etc. can&#039;t get their acts together then it does more harm to the sport than good.  If Floyd cheated then I want him gone, but I can&#039;t bring myself to trust the lab or USADA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Floyd did, maybe he didn&#8217;t.  We won&#8217;t ever really know because LNDD ought to be called &#8220;Drunken Pierre&#8217;s House of Science Testing and Stuff&#8221;  They have repeatedly had problems with protocol and leaks.  Yet they keep their accreditation.  They should get one chance, just like the riders.  If they have leaks or don&#8217;t follow protocol, then they should have their licenses pulled.  All of their evidence would have been thrown out in any criminal proceedings.  Additionally, USADA just showed how biased they are by how they handled the hearings, and ruled in favor of a shaky case for doping for something like the 30th time.  (Remember, NO ONE has ever won an appeal to them)  I&#8217;m all for kicking cheaters out of the sport, but the labs need to be held to the same standard.  If you are going to ruin someone&#8217;s career, then you had better have bulletproof evidence.  If the UCI, WADA, LNDD, ASO, etc. can&#8217;t get their acts together then it does more harm to the sport than good.  If Floyd cheated then I want him gone, but I can&#8217;t bring myself to trust the lab or USADA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3193</guid>
		<description>&quot;Either way Landis could far out-ride my sorry ass on any given day so I can’t say shit.&quot;

Sure you can.  Even lowly Cat-4&#039;s are victimzed by dopers.  Guys like Floyd provide the motivation for these yutzes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Either way Landis could far out-ride my sorry ass on any given day so I can’t say shit.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure you can.  Even lowly Cat-4&#8242;s are victimzed by dopers.  Guys like Floyd provide the motivation for these yutzes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrunkenBiker</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3192</link>
		<dc:creator>DrunkenBiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3192</guid>
		<description>Dope. No dope. 

Either way Landis could far out-ride my sorry ass on any given day so I can&#039;t say shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dope. No dope. </p>
<p>Either way Landis could far out-ride my sorry ass on any given day so I can&#8217;t say shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blatz</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3191</link>
		<dc:creator>blatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3191</guid>
		<description>Hey douchebags...yeah you.

landis is a mother fucking piece of shit cheating ass doper...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey douchebags&#8230;yeah you.</p>
<p>landis is a mother fucking piece of shit cheating ass doper&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3190</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3190</guid>
		<description>&quot;Papp attacked up the wrong side of a road with a concrete median just before the finish so nobody could get on his wheel.&quot;

How is that an unfair advantage?  Even if he remained on the same side of the road, the chaser must catch and overtake.  Otherwise, we&#039;re talking about a dead-heat (best man wins).

Do not get me wrong.  I think it sucks that Papp whored himself out to USADA in exchange for a lighter sentence of his own. Especially since Papp shed ABSOLUTELY no light on the facts of the Landis case....and I think that Landis is as guilty as hell. It still is a shame that Papp was allowed to testify. I think it was already well-established the pro cyclists dope, and dope a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Papp attacked up the wrong side of a road with a concrete median just before the finish so nobody could get on his wheel.&#8221;</p>
<p>How is that an unfair advantage?  Even if he remained on the same side of the road, the chaser must catch and overtake.  Otherwise, we&#8217;re talking about a dead-heat (best man wins).</p>
<p>Do not get me wrong.  I think it sucks that Papp whored himself out to USADA in exchange for a lighter sentence of his own. Especially since Papp shed ABSOLUTELY no light on the facts of the Landis case&#8230;.and I think that Landis is as guilty as hell. It still is a shame that Papp was allowed to testify. I think it was already well-established the pro cyclists dope, and dope a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>Trdina popped Meyerson, not Papp.

You are talking about the situation where the guy&#039;s skull was caved in, right?  That was Adam Hodges Myerson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trdina popped Meyerson, not Papp.</p>
<p>You are talking about the situation where the guy&#8217;s skull was caved in, right?  That was Adam Hodges Myerson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stikman</title>
		<link>http://drunkcyclist.com/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3188</link>
		<dc:creator>stikman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drunkcyclist.com/wordpress/2007/09/20/landis-ruling/#comment-3188</guid>
		<description>So much for the Murrieta parade I was planning....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for the Murrieta parade I was planning&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

